NPR
Supreme Court strikes Colorado ban on conversion therapy
+706 words added -380 words removed
Nina Totenberg
The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on March 4 in Washington, D.C. Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images hide caption
Stay up to date with our Politics newsletter, sent weekly.
− The Supreme Court has ruled that Colorado's law banning conversion therapy "regulates speech based on viewpoint."
At issue was the practice of an evangelical Christian, Kaley Chiles, a counselor who wants to provide talk therapy to teenagers seeking to discuss their sexual orientation or gender identity, including those hoping to "reduce or eliminate unwanted sexual attractions, change sexual behaviors, or grow in the experience of harmony with one's physical body," according to her complaint.
+ Siding with a Christian counselor in Colorado, the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday tossed out the state's law banning conversion therapy. The decision could well invalidate laws in some two dozen other states — laws that bar mental health therapists from practicing a version of talk therapy that seeks to change a teenager's sexual orientation or gender identity.
− Her lawyer argued that Colorado's law prevents voluntary conversations with minors seeking her help.
The majority opinion states, "the lower courts erred by failing to apply sufficiently rigorous First Amendment scrutiny."
"As applied to Ms.
+ Conversion therapy is generally defined as a treatment used to change a person's attraction to individuals of the same sex or to "cure" gender dysphoria.
− Chiles, Colorado's law regulates the content of her speech and goes further to prescribe what views she may and may not express, discriminating on the basis of viewpoint," the opinion says.
+ The therapy has been forcefully repudiated by every major medical organization in the country, on grounds that the therapy doesn't work and often leads to deep depression and suicidal thoughts and actions in minors.
− Law Supreme Court seems highly doubtful of limits on conversion therapy for minors Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, pointing to precedent on states regulating health care professionals.
+ But on Tuesday the court delivered a major victory to therapist Kaley Chiles, who denies that her services are coercive and says clients come to her voluntarily.
Law Who is an American?
− "Stated simply, the majority has failed to appreciate the crucial context in which Chiles's constitutional claims have arisen," she wrote. "Chiles is not speaking in the ether; she is providing therapy to minors as a licensed healthcare professional."
The court heard arguments on the case in October and appeared to lean toward the therapist at the time.
+ The Supreme Court will decide Chiles challenged the Colorado law, contending that it violated her First Amendment right of free speech by subjecting her to possible punishment for using talk therapy to help teenage minors struggling with their sexual orientation or gender dysphoria.
− The case involved a new wrinkle on "conversion therapy." It's generally defined as a treatment used to change a person's attraction to same-sex individuals and to similarly cure gender dysphoria.
+ By an 8-to-1 vote, the Supreme Court agreed with her.
− In whatever form, the therapy has been forcefully repudiated by every major medical organization in the country on the grounds that it doesn't work and often leads to depression and suicidal thoughts in minors.
+ Writing for the court majority, Justice Neil Gorsuch said that the Colorado law, as applied to Chiles, impermissibly regulated her speech by forbidding her from doing anything in her counseling that attempts to change a client's sexual orientation or gender identity.
− But during arguments in the fall, Chiles' lawyer, James Campbell, told the justices that the way his client wishes to practice conversion therapy involves no physical restraints or coercion of any kind.
+ "I'm grateful that my speech is protected," Chiles said after the ruling.
− Rather, he said her practice involves only talk therapy.
+ "But I'm even more excited that families and children seeking access to counselling that respects biological reality will be able to get the help that they need."
Law Supreme Court appears likely to uphold state bans on transgender athletes Colorado had defended its state law, contending that the statute is narrow, applies only to minors, and allows anyone of any age to seek counseling from religious organizations without being subject to state licensing laws.
− "Ms.
+ "If you take away the ability of states to protect patients from substandard care, then you're opening the door to all sorts of discredited treatments," Colorado Attorney General Philip Weiser said last fall.
"This decision, it's so hypocritical," said Shannon Minter, legal director for the National Center for LGBTQ Rights.
− Chiles is being silenced.
+ "I do not understand how the same Supreme Court can, with one breath, say it's fine for Tennessee to ban a type of medical care for transgender young people and on the other hand say it is not OK for Colorado to protect gay and transgender young people against a type of treatment that really no one could possibly defend."
That said, the court was nearly unanimous in its decision.
− The kids and families who want help — this kind of help that she offers — are being left without any support," he asserted.
+ Justice Gorsuch, in his opinion for the court, noted that "the First Amendment stands as a shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country. It reflects instead a judgment that every American possesses an inalienable right to think and speak freely."
Law Supreme Court seems highly doubtful of limits on conversion therapy for minors Reflecting on the decision Tuesday, Minter said, "There's a few glimmers of light in this otherwise terrible decision." One of those glimmers, he added, comes from Justice Elena Kagan's concurring opinion, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
− The outcome of the case could mean a rollback on conversion therapy bans across the country.
+ "I believe she is trying to signal and express that it may be possible for states to go back and redraft these laws in a way that is much more explicitly neutral," he said.
− Sponsor Message
Become an NPR sponsor
+ Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the lone dissenter, took the unusual step of explaining her dissent from the bench.
National Federal judge finds Trump violated free speech by ordering NPR defunded "No one directly disputes that Colorado has the power to regulate the medical treatments that state-licensed professionals provide to patients," she said, adding, "So, in my view, it cannot also be the case that Colorado's decision to restrict a dangerous therapy modality that, incidentally, involves provider speech is presumptively unconstitutional."
In concluding otherwise, she said, the court's opinion "misreads our precedents, is unprincipled and unworkable, and will eventually prove untenable for those who rely upon the long-recognized responsibility of States to regulate the medical profession for the protection of public health."
Sponsor Message
Become an NPR sponsor