Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., shares his thoughts on the U.S.-Iran peace talks

+ Accessibility links Skip to main content Keyboard shortcuts for audio player Open Navigation Menu --> Newsletters NPR Shop Close Navigation Menu Home News Expand/collapse submenu for News National World Politics Business Health Science Climate Race Culture Expand/collapse submenu for Culture Books Movies Television Pop Culture Food Art & Design Performing Arts Life Kit Gaming Music Expand/collapse submenu for Music Tiny Desk New Music Friday All Songs Considered Music Features Live Sessions Podcasts & Shows Expand/collapse submenu for Podcasts & Shows Daily Morning Edition Weekend Edition Saturday Weekend Edition Sunday All Things Considered Up First Here & Now NPR Politics Podcast Featured Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me!

+ Fresh Air Wild Card with Rachel Martin It's Been a Minute Planet Money Get NPR+ More Podcasts & Shows Search Newsletters NPR Shop Tiny Desk New Music Friday All Songs Considered Music Features Live Sessions About NPR Diversity Support Careers Press Ethics Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., shares his thoughts on the U.S.-Iran peace talks NPR's Leila Fadel asks Democratic Rep.

+ Politics Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., shares his thoughts on the U.S.-Iran peace talks June 2, 20266:46 AM ET Heard on Morning Edition Leila Fadel Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., shares his thoughts on the U.S.-Iran peace talks Listen &middot; 4:50 4:50 Transcript Toggle more options Download Embed Embed "> <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/nx-s1-5843118/nx-s1-9793723" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player"> Transcript NPR's Leila Fadel asks Democratic Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut, ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, for his view of the U.S.-Iran ceasefire and negotiations. Sponsor Message LEILA FADEL, HOST: Let's turn now to Connecticut Congressman Jim Himes. He's the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee. Good morning, Congressman.

+ JIM HIMES: Good morning. FADEL: Thank you for being here. So we heard there from our correspondent, I mean, there's growing daylight between President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over this war in Iran. And there's also this reporting from Axios that there was this apparently expletive-filled call between Trump and Netanyahu, in which Trump demanded to know what Israel was doing and saying that people hate Israel over what they're doing right now. NPR hasn't verified this reporting, but what do you make of this growing tension? HIMES: Yeah. Well, I don't think it's in any way surprising, right? Prime Minister Netanyahu and Donald Trump have, in many ways, opposed political incentives here, right? We know where Donald Trump's head is right now 'cause he says it four times a day on Truth Social. He wants this thing over. He's bored. He understands that one of the reasons he's got historically low approval ratings is that Americans are now paying a buck 50 more for a gallon of gas. Inflation is going up. People hate this war in the United States. He wants this over three weeks ago. The prime minister, on the other hand, who faces elections in October - if he is perceived as, you know, first of all, you know, not finishing a job inside Israel, he -the one argument he has for reelection is that I am the most aggressive person to keep you safe. If he doesn't - if he walks away without - with an unclear victory over Hezbollah or having caved to the American president, he's in real trouble in the October elections. And of course, behind the prime minister losing, if he did, in fact, lose elections, is the possibility of legal action or, you know, real scrutiny of the lead-up till October 7. He obviously wants to avoid all of those things. FADEL: There's also a lot of confusing or mixed messaging that's been coming from the president. We heard him tell CNBC on Monday that talks with Iran, quote, "started to get very boring," that he, quote, "couldn't care less" if negotiations are over. We also heard that he said they're back on track and going fine. I mean, how do you view these comments? HIMES: Well, I mean, this - that's a sort of water-is-wet observation, right? I mean, (laughter) you know, from the very moment this war started, frankly, from the moment Donald Trump became president, you always get the maximalist - the most optimistic take - the greatest country, the hottest country. This war will take two weeks. We did regime change, even though, obviously, we didn't. I mean, you know, observing that the president's communications are both, you know, fantastical and, you know, optimistic is - that's what he does. Now, what's interesting here is the contrast - right? - with President Obama in 2015, you know, because President Obama in 2015 actually did secure a deal to stop the Iranian progress towards a nuclear weapon, but it took a year of painstaking and brutal negotiations to get there. And now Donald Trump is trying to do those negotiations in a matter of days at a time when the Iranians really have the strategic upper hand with, you know, again, you know, global energy prices having absolutely skyrocketed, with the Iranians having proven that their regime can survive the worst that the American military can throw at them. You know, and again, Donald Trump is just not known for his steady application in patience, which seems to be the ingredients that you need to actually secure a real deal with the Iranians. FADEL: You know, you bring up the 2015 deal. My co-host, Steve Inskeep, spoke to State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott yesterday on the program. And he said, well, actually, the president's focused on making a stronger deal than former President Barack Obama, that his preference has always been diplomacy, a diplomatic deal. He's a dealmaker. From your position in leadership on the House Intelligence Committee, do you have any understanding that the U.S. is closing in on a diplomatic path to the end of the war with a better deal than what existed in 2015? HIMES: I mean, come on. That's absurd on the face of it. This is a president who prefers diplomacy. Really? Tell that to Venezuela. Tell that to Cuba. Tell that to Denmark and Greenland. Tell that to the people of Iran. I mean, it's just, you know, Orwellian "Nineteen Eighty-Four" stuff. Of course he doesn't abide by diplomacy 'cause diplomacy is boring, and you need to compromise, and you can't claim the absolute wins that the president wants. So, no. No. We're - you know, look, the Iranians understand that there's a lot more damage they can do. They can destroy an awful lot more energy infrastructure. They've got - they've - you know, they're in a strategically positive place. FADEL: That's Democratic Congressman Jim Himes of Connecticut. Thank you for your time and your insights. HIMES: Thank you. Copyright &copy; 2026 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information. Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts may vary. Transcript text may be revised to correct errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org may be edited after its original broadcast or publication. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record. Facebook Flipboard Email Read & Listen Home News Culture Music Podcasts & Shows Connect Newsletters Facebook Instagram Press Public Editor Corrections Transcripts Contact & Help About NPR Overview Diversity NPR Network Accessibility Ethics Finances Get Involved Support Public Radio Sponsor NPR NPR Careers NPR Shop NPR Extra Terms of Use Privacy Your Privacy Choices Text Only Sponsor Message Sponsor Message Become an NPR sponsor (function () { var loadPageJs = function () { (window.webpackJsonp=window.webpackJsonp||[]).push([[22],{1169:function(e,n,c){e.exports=c(321)},321:function(e,n,c){"use strict";c.p=NPR.serverVars.webpackPublicPath,Promise.all([c.e(1),c.e(2),c.e(3),c.e(4),c.e(82)]).then(function(e){c(3),c(1141),c(116),c(95),c(52),c(491),c(240),c(102),c(104),c(1142),c(144),c(1143),c(239),c(48),c(1144)}.bind(null,c)).catch(c.oe)}},[[1169,0]]]); }; if (document.readyState === 'complete') { loadPageJs(); } else { window.addEventListener('load', function load() { window.removeEventListener('load', load, false); loadPageJs(); }); } })();